Yup, it's that time of year again. At last check, with over 6000 members, TLA is the 2nd biggest library organization in the states. This year promises to be as jam packed as previous years. Aside from the full program of sessions, I thought I would highlight those events that I am intimately involved with this year.
Hot Topics Slam by Texas CE Providers -- This session was designed to provide attendees with 5 mini-training sessions from 5 different library training providers. The topics are as varied as the needs of library staff.
Continuing Education Providers Interest Group Business Meeting -- I am the outgoing chair and this is the last meeting on my watch. We will be looking at the State-wide training calendar and creating a Master Trainer series for Texas libraries to stave off the impending retirement gap.
TLA Gaming Event -- Every year the outgoing president of TLA is afforded a celebration. The President's Party is Wednesday night of conference and is an all-conference (no cost) party. This year we are saying thank you and goodbye to Melody Kelly, the assistant dean at UNT Libraries (and one of my bosses). Part of this event is a whole Gaming Banaza. TLA has partnered with Best Buy to provide console games, big screen tvs, and all the tech support associated with such an event. MY little part in this play is that I'm the Head Game Warden. I've been working to help organize the event most particularly the volunteer group that will be on hand to assist. We have about 28 volunteers at this moment and still recruiting more. In addition to video games we will be having a tabletop games area.
If you're anywhere near Houston the 1st week of April, I welcome you to come check out the conference. Even if you don't do the sessions, the exhibit hall ALWAYS promises to be worth the price of an exhibits only pass.
A blog with thoughts on training, collection development, products, and any other library related topics that we might think up.
Showing posts with label committees. Show all posts
Showing posts with label committees. Show all posts
March 12, 2009
April 06, 2007
My first Curriculum Committee meeting
Yesterday afternoon I attended my first Undergraduate Curricula Committee Meeting. Normally, my manager sits in on this committee, but she's on vacation, so I got to go. I was a little lost at first, but it was interesting. Apparently, there have been a lot of changes this year, so this was an additional meeting for the semeseter. Many of the changes were changes in prerequistes, but there were new classes (adds) and courses that were dropped (deleted). Interestingly (to me anyway) some of the changes were to the programs themselves and many were to drop the required degree hours down to around 120, with the exception of one degree which actually took the required hours to 133. Naturally, many of the changes were to meet accreditation standards and must go through the state board of education.
Information about adds and changes in degrees is passed on to the librarian responsible for collection development for that area. This is good as it helps to determine what areas to order in, especially in light of new classes. Naturally, when degrees are added we are a part of the process.
So, you might wonder why this is intriguing to me. At my former library, a representative from the library was not on either of the curriculum committees, undergraduate or graduate (even in a non-voting capacity as we are here). Since the faculty did most of the ordering, in theory this shouldn't have been a problem. However, as I pointed out in a previous post, faculty tend to order for their research needs at times and not necessarily in support of the programs being taught. The result is that the library may not have materials needed to support a class.
We had always believed the library should be included on these committees and after attending this meeting, I'm sure of it. No, we don't need to vote, but if the school is going to support the classes, then the library needs to have materials available. No, not all classes will require library support, but many will. By participating on the committee the library is aware of what the departments are teaching and no extra step is needed to bring the library into the loop.
Information about adds and changes in degrees is passed on to the librarian responsible for collection development for that area. This is good as it helps to determine what areas to order in, especially in light of new classes. Naturally, when degrees are added we are a part of the process.
So, you might wonder why this is intriguing to me. At my former library, a representative from the library was not on either of the curriculum committees, undergraduate or graduate (even in a non-voting capacity as we are here). Since the faculty did most of the ordering, in theory this shouldn't have been a problem. However, as I pointed out in a previous post, faculty tend to order for their research needs at times and not necessarily in support of the programs being taught. The result is that the library may not have materials needed to support a class.
We had always believed the library should be included on these committees and after attending this meeting, I'm sure of it. No, we don't need to vote, but if the school is going to support the classes, then the library needs to have materials available. No, not all classes will require library support, but many will. By participating on the committee the library is aware of what the departments are teaching and no extra step is needed to bring the library into the loop.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)